The experimenters' regress: from skepticism to argumentation
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The regress argument against Cartesian skepticism
Does the external world exist, as it so concretely seems? Perhaps not, says the Cartesian skeptic. After all, if you were dreaming or hallucinating, if an evil demon were bent on deceiving you, or if, god forbid, you were a brain in a vat, things might appear to you in just the same way. Why think, then, that you are experiencing good old reality rather than some dream or other fiction? Absent ...
متن کاملComparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism
The issue of formalizing skepticism relations between argumentation semantics has been considered only recently in the literature. In this paper, we contribute to this kind of analysis by providing a systematic comparison of a significant set of literature semantics (namely grounded, complete, preferred, stable, semi-stable, ideal, prudent, and CF2 semantics) using both a weak and a strong skep...
متن کاملEvaluating Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism Adequacy
Analyzing argumentation semantics with respect to the notion of skepticism is an important issue for developing general and wellfounded comparisons among existing approaches. In this paper, we show that the notion of skepticism plays also a significant role in order to better understand the behavior of a specific semantics in different situations. Building on an articulated classification of ar...
متن کاملfrom linguistics to literature: a linguistic approach to the study of linguistic deviations in the turkish divan of shahriar
chapter i provides an overview of structural linguistics and touches upon the saussurean dichotomies with the final goal of exploring their relevance to the stylistic studies of literature. to provide evidence for the singificance of the study, chapter ii deals with the controversial issue of linguistics and literature, and presents opposing views which, at the same time, have been central to t...
15 صفحه اولTowards a Formalization of Skepticism in Extension-based Argumentation Semantics
This paper provides a preliminary investigation towards the definition of a general framework for the comparison of extension-based argumentation semantics with respect to the notion of skepticism. We identify seven justification states for arguments and define two alternative skepticism relations between semantics, which induce a partial order on the justification states, reflecting the releva...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
سال: 2002
ISSN: 0039-3681
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00032-2